Legal Opinion
City of Birmingham v. Bergreen
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1922No. 6 Div. 932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.
The defendant was acquitted of a violation of an amended traffic ordinance of the city of Birmingham; his demurrers to the complaint filed by the city, first having been sustained, the cause being considered by the trial court under the following agreed statement of facts:
“By agreement of the attorney for the city of Birmingham and the defendant herein this cause shall be heard upon the following agreed statement of facts:,
“The defendant, a resident citizen and taxpayer of the city of Birmingham, in Jefferson county, Alabama, admits that on the 13th day of April, 1921, he was driving an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex parte BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Mills v. Court of Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Bozeman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Ward v. MarksteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Foshee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cole v. GullattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Phenix City v. PutnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Ex Parte City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922