Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Bergreen

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1922No. 6 Div. 932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.

The defendant was acquitted of a violation of an amended traffic ordinance of the city of Birmingham; his demurrers to the complaint filed by the city, first having been sustained, the cause being considered by the trial court under the following agreed statement of facts:

“By agreement of the attorney for the city of Birmingham and the defendant herein this cause shall be heard upon the following agreed statement of facts:,
“The defendant, a resident citizen and taxpayer of the city of Birmingham, in Jefferson county, Alabama, admits that on the 13th day of April, 1921, he was driving an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Mills v. Court of Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Bozeman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Ward v. MarksteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Foshee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cole v. GullattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Phenix City v. PutnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Ex Parte City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API