Phenix City v. Putnam
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
Appellee was convicted of violating an ordinance of the City of Phenix City and was fined $5 and costs. He appealed to the circuit court where a demurrer was filed to the city’s complaint. Appellee filed his answer without waiving the ruling on the demurrer. The trial court sustained the demurrer and acquitted and discharged the defendant on the ground that the ordinance was void. The city appeals.
The ordinance required a registration of private automobiles which use the streets of Phenix City and fixed the registration fee at $5. The reporter will include the ordinance in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ward v. MarksteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Colvin v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- In re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- City of Tuscaloosa v. HanlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hendrix, Mohr & Yardley, Inc. v. City of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Ott v. MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Atkins v. City of Tarrant CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Benson W. Peak v. City of Tuscaloosa.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Dothard v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.