Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Meinholdt Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 29, 1971No. 71-1143PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
This unfair labor practice case involves the question of whether there is substantial evidence supporting the National Labor Relations Board’s conclusions that Meinholdt Manufacturing, Inc. of Topeka, Kansas, violated §§ 8(a) (1) (by prohibiting employee Irwin from talking to fellow employees at any time about terms and conditions of employment and threatening him with discharge should he do so and by threatening employees with discharge for engaging in union activities) and 8(a) (3) and (1) (for discharging employee Irwin because of his union activities) of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- National Labor Relations Board v. O. A. Fuller Super Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Midland Steel Products Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Rio Hatton JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Anco Construction Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Bill's Coal Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Cannady, D/b/a, Bob White Target Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Cannady, D/b/a, Bob White Target Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- National Labor Relations Board v. Beech Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.