Legal Opinion
Spiewak v. Board of Education
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 22, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
PRESSLER, J. A. D.
This is a teacher-tenure controversy.
Petitioners Rita Spiewak and Peggy Dabinett have each been employed by the Rutherford Board of Education (district) since the early 1970s as “Beadleston” supplementary teachers of the handicapped,1 and petitioner Patricia O’Reilly has been employed by the Rutherford Board of Education since February 1973 as a “Title I” remedial reading teacher. All three appeal from a determination of the State Board of Education denying them status as members of the teaching staff of the district and accordingly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robinson v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Point Pleasant Beach Teachers Ass'n v. CallamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Schulz v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- Board of Education of Jersey City v. WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Biancardi v. Waldwick Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spiewak v. Rutherford Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Schmidt v. Unified School District No. 497Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Maxfield v. Board of Education of RidgewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Donvito v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Maxfield v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.