Legal Opinion
The Pillsbury Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 15, 2005No. 2004-1591PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Chief Judge.
The Pillsbury Company (“Pillsbury”) appeals the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade upholding the tariff classification of its imported Haagen-Dazs dessert bars by the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”). 1 Pillsbury Co. v. United States, 341 F.Supp.2d 1290 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2004). Because the finding that the Haagen-Dazs dessert bars are not predominantly sorbet, but frozen ice milk intermixed with yogurt, which is distinguishable from traditional yogurt, is not clearly erroneous, the dessert bars were properly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Medline Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Michael Simon Design, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- La Crosse Technology, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.