Legal Opinion

La Crosse Technology, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 29, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-26; Court 07-00114PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff La Crosse Technology, Ltd. (“La Crosse”) challenges U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) classification of imported weather measurement devices and clocks. Proper administrative protest procedure having been undertaken and all liquidated duties, taxes and fees having been paid, see 19 U.S.C. §§ 1514, 1515, jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a).

I. Facts

Plaintiff La Crosse imports electronic devices which can measure, display and/or record various atmospheric and weather conditions. 1 In addition, the devices at issue function…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. La Crosse Technology, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. La Crosse Technology, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API