Legal Opinion

Croonquist v. Walker

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1927Published

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The defendant, Margaret Walker, appeals to this court from an order of the district court of Stutsman county refusing to grant her motion to dismiss this case as to both defendants; the motion being made under the provisions of § 7845 of the Compiled Laws.

This action was commenced October 13, 1922, by the service of the summons and complaint upon William Walker, and Margaret Walker, his wife. The complaint alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff sold and delivered to the two defendants between October 12, 1916, and October 15, 1919, goods and wearing apparel worth and of the value of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strom v. Montana Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Chapman v. HillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Rex Buggy Co. v. DinneenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bonesteel v. OrvisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Croonquist v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API