Legal Opinion

Rex Buggy Co. v. Dinneen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Beadle County. Hon. J. H. Bottum, Judge. Action by the Rex Buggy Company against Stephen D. Dinneen. From an order overruling a motion to dismiss the action, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

On June 26, 1909, this court affirmed an order of the circuit' court granting the plaintiff’s application for a new trial in this action and remanding the cause for further proceedings according to law and its decision. Rex. Buggy Co v. Dinneen, 23 S. D. 474, 122 N. W. 433. The record and remittitur were filed in the circuit court January 31, 1910. During the December, 1910, term of that court the defendant moved to dismiss the action on the ground that no proceedings were had therein within the time prescribed by the statute. The motion was overruled and this appeal taken.

The statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Root v. BinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Root v. SweeneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Rex Buggy Co. v. DinneenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reuben C. Setliff, III, M.D., P.C. v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Chapman v. HillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Sears v. McKeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lamar Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. Heavy Constructors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Croonquist v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API