Hall v. Rutherford
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Garland-Circuit Court; W. H. Evans, Judge; Appellant was an interested party, and had a right to appeal. 64 Ark. 349. He had no notice, and could not be made a party to the record. Appellant was not a party to the record, and could not appeal. 28 Ark. 479; 47 Id. 411; 30 Id. 578; 52 Id. 99; -26 Id. 461.
1Opinion of the CourtFraurnthar, J.
On -the 8th day of October, 1906, Scott Boaz filed in the Garland Probate Court his account and claim against the estate of Bolinda Todhunter for $340. The claim was duly verified in manner prescribed by law, and had been duly presented to and allowed by the administrator of said estate. On October 27, 1906, the claim came on for hearing before the probate court of Garland County,' and that court, finding the same correct, rendered judgment for the amount of the claim in favor of Scott Boaz and against said estate.. In that court the only parties who appeared or who were made parties to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ouachita Baptist College v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
- Scott v. PennSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Turner v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Arnett v. McCainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1873
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rhodes v. DriverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Campbell v. City of Cherokee Village WestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- McKenzie v. CrowleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Beneux v. BeneuxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935