Chet Wilson v. Skopos Financial, LLC, doing business as Reprise Financial
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION CHET WILSON, Case No. 6:25-cv-00376-MC Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. SKOPOS FINANCIAL, LLC, doing business as Reprise Financial, Defendant. MCSHANE, Judge: Defendant Reprise Financial moves for summary judgment against Plaintiff Chet Wilson’s Telephone Consumer Protection Act claim. Because Plaintiff’s claim turns on the purpose of the text messages he received from Defendant, which constitutes a disputed material fact, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 28, is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.