Legal Opinion
Agnew v. E TRADE SECURITIES LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 9, 2011No. 2:10-cr-00058PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On April 4, 2010, pro se Petitioners William H. Agnew and Bernadine R. Agnew (“Petitioners” or “Agnews”) initiated this action against Respondent E*Trade Securities, LLC (“Respondent” or “E*Trade”) by filing a motion to vacate a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) award, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 10-11. On July 7, 2011, the Court entered default against E*Trade shortly after service upon E*Trade was effectuated.
E*Trade brought a Motion to Set Aside Default. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Emcasco Insurance Company v. Louis SambrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Mindek v. RigattiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harrison v. Brew Vino, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- JP Cap. Guam, LLC v. Chieh-Yu PaiSuperior Court of Guam · 2026
- Ojo v. Brew Vino LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021