Commonwealth v. Schindler
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Appellant swore falsely, before an investigating grand jury, was indicted for perjury by a succéeding grand jury, and convicted.
His first contention is that the investigating grand jury was not a competent tribunal because the district attorney’s petition which brought it into being was de*339fective, and that the court below erred in denying his motion to quash.
The district attorney’s petition, in part, alleged: “That it has come to the attention of your petitioner, by means of newspaper articles and from other sources, that there are numerous violations of gambling laws being…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNair's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Christoffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dauphin County Grand Jury Investigation ProceedingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Philadelphia County Grand Jury Investigation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. Hubbs (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BroughtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BeddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth v. BestwickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. GoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.