Legal Opinion
Kirk v. Shaffer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 11, 1955No. 35332PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
1. “Where, in ruling upon demurrers, the trial court allows time for the filing of an amendment, such court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the earlier judgment on the demurrers and such earlier judgment or judgments shall not be subject to exception or review.” Weinstein v. Rothberg, 87 Ga. App. 94 (73 S. E. 2d 106); Aiken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S. E. 2d 141), and citations. Under an application of the foregoing rule of law to the facts of this case,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Hart Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Weinstein v. RothbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Thomas & McCafferty v. SieselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Wortham v. SinclairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Aiken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. K. & L. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964