Fleischman v. Protect Our City
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Justice.
¶ 1 The legislature has directed, as a matter of general law, that once petition signature sheets are filed in support of a ballot measure, “no additional petition sheets may be accepted for filing.” Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 19-121(B) (2002). Consistent with this mandate, we hold that municipal laws that allow the filing of supplemental signatures in support of local ballot measures are invalid. This opinion explains the reasons for our order dated January 12, 2007, which affirmed the superior court’s judgment barring an initiative from appearing on the ballot for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Hancock v. BisnarArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Union Transportes De Nogales v. City of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Fidelity National Title Co. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of BensonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Jones v. PaniaguaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Fidelity National Title v. Town of Marana Bronson NessingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.