James Edward Flemings v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
We agree with the District Court that of the grounds upon which appellant relies in seeking discharge in habeas corpus the only one presenting a Constitutional issue is his contention that an incriminating statement was used against him contrary to Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964) and that the rule of that case should be retroactively applied to his trial. Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966) disposes of this contention.
We do not consider those grounds for relief which appellant asserted for the first time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Billy Joe Wright v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden, California State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- James v. CopingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Jord O. Hale v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Joseph J. Tynan v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Wendell Dean Allen v. M. R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Charles M. Owens v. C. J. Fitzharris, Superintendent, Soledad State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.