Legal Opinion
Jord O. Hale v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1966No. 20755_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted and sentenced in 1960 on his plea of guilty to charges of violating sections 209 and 211 of the California Criminal Code. His petition for habeas corpus was based upon the theory that his guilty plea was induced by a confession obtained in violation of the rule of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964). The district court denied the petition without a hearing on the ground that the Escobedo rule is to be applied prospectively only. See Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966).
By…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Herman v. ClaudySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Billy Joe Wright v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden, California State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden San Quentin State Prison v. Glenn RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- John N. Johnson v. Lawrence E. Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Connie Mack Dalrymple v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, San Quentin PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Laurence E. Boseant, Jr. v. C. J. Fitzharris, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden San Quentin State Prison v. Glenn RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.