Legal Opinion
People v. Radcliffe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court correctly determined that the warrantless entry of defendant’s apartment was justified under the emergency exception to the warrant requirement (see, Mincey v Arizona, 437 US 385; People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173, cert denied 426 US 953). Prior to the entry, police were attempting to locate a missing four-year-old child. The police investigation revealed that the child’s mother had taken him to his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. OliverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. FelipeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. RuffinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. RadcliffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026