People v. Radcliffe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Resentence unanimously reversed on the law and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The contention that defendant was denied the right to be present during a Sandoval conference (see, People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254; People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656) is not properly before this Court. That contention was raised on a CPL 330.30 motion, made after defendant’s conviction had been affirmed and after the matter had been remitted for resentencing (People v Radcliffe, 185 AD2d 662, Iv denied 80 NY2d 976). This appeal is limited to issues…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. RadcliffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RichardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996