Legal Opinion

People v. Radcliffe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Resentence unanimously reversed on the law and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The contention that defendant was denied the right to be present during a Sandoval conference (see, People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254; People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656) is not properly before this Court. That contention was raised on a CPL 330.30 motion, made after defendant’s conviction had been affirmed and after the matter had been remitted for resentencing (People v Radcliffe, 185 AD2d 662, Iv denied 80 NY2d 976). This appeal is limited to issues…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. People v. CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. RadcliffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RichardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API