Legal Opinion

Mark Habelt v. Irhythm Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2023No. 22-15660PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARK HABELT, individually and on No. 22-15660 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, * 00776-EMC and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ OPINION RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; KEVIN M. KING; MICHAEL J. COYLE; DOUGLAS J. DEVINE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding * The caption’s reference to Mark Habelt as “Plaintiff-Appellant” reflects the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Sergio Ramirez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Columbia Legal Services v. Stemilt Ag Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  2. La Union del Pueblo v. BettencourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  3. Pacific Data Systems, Inc. v. Guam Department of Education, Teleguam Holdings LLC dba GTA, Defendant-Intervenor-AppellantSupreme Court of Guam · 2024
  4. John Brown v. United Financial Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Skinner v. American Family Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API