Mark Habelt v. Irhythm Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARK HABELT, individually and on No. 22-15660 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, * 00776-EMC and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ OPINION RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; KEVIN M. KING; MICHAEL J. COYLE; DOUGLAS J. DEVINE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding * The caption’s reference to Mark Habelt as “Plaintiff-Appellant” reflects the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sergio Ramirez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Columbia Legal Services v. Stemilt Ag Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- La Union del Pueblo v. BettencourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Pacific Data Systems, Inc. v. Guam Department of Education, Teleguam Holdings LLC dba GTA, Defendant-Intervenor-AppellantSupreme Court of Guam · 2024
- John Brown v. United Financial Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Skinner v. American Family Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.