Legal Opinion

Curran v. Porkar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements and motion denied, with $10 costs. Memorandum: The plaintiff demanded a verified bill of particulars relating to defendant’s answer and counterclaim. Defendant did not comply with the demand and plaintiff moved for an order precluding the defendant “ from appearing herein, striking out his answer and counterclaim and from giving any evidence upon the trial or inquest herein concerning any of the matters alleged in his alleged answer and counterclaim.” The appeal is from the order granting that motion in all respects. While the defendant failed…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Desimone v. RobertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Boin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York District Court · 1960
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. 307 Summer Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Decker v. Norton, Lilly & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Rogers v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API