Legal Opinion

Ng Heu Yim v. Bonham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1935No. 7944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a Chinese person, sought admission to the United States, claiming to be a native-born citizen thereof who, as a child, had gone to China, and was entitled to re-enter. A Special Board of Inquiry, appointed under section 17 of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917, c. 29, 39 Stat. 887, 8 USCA § 153, determined, after hearing, that appellant should not be admitted. On appeal, the Secretary of Labor upheld this determination. Appellant then petitioned the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus, *656and, from an order denying his petition, has appealed to this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Kwock Jan Fat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Tang Tun v. EdsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grace Bros. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. United States Ex Rel. Medeiros v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Jung Yen Loy v. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Jung Yen Loy v. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Mock Gum Ying v. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API