Legal Opinion

Jung Yen Loy v. Cahill

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1936No. 7967Published

1Opinion of the Court

81 F.2d 809 (1936)

JUNG YEN LOY

v.

CAHILL, Com'r of Immigration, etc.

No. 7967.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 10, 1936.

Stephen M. White, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

H. H. McPike, U. S. Atty., and Robert L. McWilliams, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal. (Arthur J. Phelan, U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, of San Francisco, Cal., on the brief), for appellee.

Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

The District Court for the Northern District of California denied appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Kwock Jan Fat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Tang Tun v. EdsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Quon Quon Poy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API