Legal Opinion
Wicks v. O'Connell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 7, 1985No. 16-82-01216; CA A32221PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for fraud in the sale of securities. The action against O’Connell was automatically stayed as a result of his filing a petition in bankruptcy. 11 USC § 362 (1983). Plaintiff did not move to sever the actions against the two defendants or to dismiss the action actions against the two defendants or to dismiss the action against O’Connell. The case proceeded against Fawcett alone, and the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, from which Fawcett appeals. The judgmént establishes the liability of Fawcett alone. We dismiss the appeal for want of an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. Asbestos Litigation Group (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- GAF Corp. v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van DykeOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Jeanette v. James Hunter MacHine Co. (In Re James Hunter MacHine Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wicks v. O'CONNELLCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988