Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 18, 1978No. 33160, CA 11086Published

1DissentThornton, J.

The majority opinion holds that an order of vacation entered by a board of county commissioners cannot be challenged by writ of review because it is a "legislative” decision.

I must respectfully disagree. My reasons are as follows: First, the court’s decision is (a) in direct conflict with ORS 203.200 and 203.120(3); and (b) contrary to the settled case law in this state recognizing the right of an interested party to challenge county road vacation proceedings by writ of review.

ORS 203.200 provides as follows:

"The decisions of the county court made in the transaction of county business shall…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Green v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Minard v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Culver v. DaggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API