Legal Opinion
Commercial Nat. Bank v. Treasurer of Franklin County
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 7, 1930No. 533PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, the Commercial National Bank, the Huntington National Bank, and ihe Ohio National Bank, national banking associations of Columbus, Ohio, sue the treas*214urer of Franklin county, Ohio, who is the official tax collector of such taxes as are legally assessed and collectable against said plaintiffs, for an order of injunction to prevent the collection by said’ defendant of the taxes assessed against said plaintiffs for the last half of 1926 and the year 1927.
The basis for the remedy is that the taxes assessed under the state taxing machinery, and sought to be…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- People v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Des Moines National Bank v. FairweatherSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Central United Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Hoenig v. Huntington Nat. Bank of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Boise City Nat. Bank v. Ada CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1931