Hoenig v. Huntington Nat. Bank of Columbus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
This cause presents for determination the question whether Rev. St. § 5219- as amended (12 USCA § 548) has been violated in respect of the assessment of local taxes upon the shares of stoek of three national banks in the city of Columbus, Ohio, for the years 1926 and 192,7. Such banks are instrumentalities of the federal government, and neither their assets nor the shares of their capital stoek may be subjected to property taxes except by and with the consent of the fefleral government. The applicable condition upon which this consent is given is printed in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- People v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Des Moines National Bank v. FairweatherSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City Loan and Savings Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Central United Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Bolick-Gillman Company v. Continental Baking CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
- Findley v. OdlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Marble Mortgage Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966