Stokes v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.
The question in this case is whether a docket-sheet entry was sufficient to show “presentment” of a motion for new trial to the trial court. We hold that it in this case it was.
The appellant was convicted of felony theft and sentenced to fifteen years’ confinement. He timely filed a motion for new trial alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. No hearing was held on the motion, which was overruled by operation of law.
The Presentment Rule
A defendant is required to “present” a motion to the trial court within ten days of filing it, unless the court, in its discretion, extends that time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Carranza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Daniels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Stokes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
3Cited by95 opinions
- Stokes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Michelle Elaine Bearnth v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Hiatt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
- Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Kirk, Tory LevonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.