Legal Opinion

Smith v. Belding

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1922No. 290—3547PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Ninth Supreme Judicial District. Action by Mrs. Abie Belding and others against W. A. Smith and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which rendered judgment (224 S. W. 562), and both parties bring error. Judgment of the Court of Civil

1Opinion of the CourtRandodph, J.

Mrs. Abie Belding et al.„ as the heirs of Dwight Belding, deceased, brought suit in the district court of Harris-county (and will hereinafter be styled plaintiffs) against H. Masterson and W. A. Smith (who will be hereinafter called defendants).

From an adverse judgment in that court the defendants took the case to the Court of' Civil Appeals for the First District, and the case was transferred to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Ninth District. That court having rendered a judgment (224 S. W. 562),. which was not satisfactory to either party, both parties applied to the Supreme Court for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Smith v. Kennard'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
  3. Chapman v. BriteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Walworth's Estate v. Bartholomew's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903
  5. Smith v. BeldingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walling v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. In the Estate of Stacy Lynn Fuchsman v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026
  3. Walling v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API