Legal Opinion

McVey v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1995No. C-950189PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Kathryn and Larry McVey appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee city of Cincinnati. In their single assignment of error, they allege that the city was not immune from liability under R.C. Chapter 2744 for injuries suffered by Kathryn McVey as a result of the city’s negligent operation of an escalator in the parking garage of a public stadium. 1 We agree and reverse the trial court’s granting of summary judgment.

FACTS

On August 31, 1991, the McVeys and their son attended a Cincinnati Reds baseball game at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Winwood v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Welch v. Rollman & Sons Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. McBrideOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Laurie Range v. Kenneth DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Essman v. PortsmouthOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Leasure v. Adena Local School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Hacker v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Inland Products, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API