McGlinn Distilling Co. v. Dervin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 286, Jan. T., 1917, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No1. 5, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1915, No. 3224, making absolute defendant’s rule for a new trial in the case of John McGlinn Distilling Company v. Helen Dervin and Owen Dervin, Executors of the Estate of Michael Dervin, deceased. Assumpsit on promissory note and book account. The facts appear in the following opinion by Monaghan, J.: The action was in assumpsit.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 286, Jan. T., 1917, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No1. 5, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1915, No. 3224, making absolute defendant’s rule for a new trial in the case of John McGlinn Distilling Company v. Helen Dervin and Owen Dervin, Executors of the Estate of Michael Dervin, deceased. Assumpsit on promissory note and book account. The facts appear in the following opinion by Monaghan, J.: The action was in assumpsit. On the trial of the case, at the close of the defendant’s testimony, the court gave binding instructions in favor of tbe plaintiff, and tbe jury found a verdict for…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Upon the opinion of the court below, sustaining a motion for a new trial, its order is affirmed.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Brelish v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Lincoln v. ChristianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.