Wade v. Brady
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GERTNER, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Robert Wade (“Wade”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to vindicate his due process right to access certain biological evidence post-conviction. He aims to subject that evidence to DNA testing and use the results, which he believes will be exculpatory, to challenge his felony murder conviction. In 2006, I held that there was a Due Process right to post-conviction access to biological evidence under certain circumstances and that Wade had properly stated a claim. I said:
DNA testing is different.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WadeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Donald v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010