Legal Opinion

Wade v. Brady

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 30, 2009No. Civil Action 04cv12135-NGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GERTNER, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

Robert Wade (“Wade”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to vindicate his due process right to access certain biological evidence post-conviction. He aims to subject that evidence to DNA testing and use the results, which he believes will be exculpatory, to challenge his felony murder conviction. In 2006, I held that there was a Due Process right to post-conviction access to biological evidence under certain circumstances and that Wade had properly stated a claim. I said:

DNA testing is different.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WadeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Donald v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API