State ex rel. Beeler v. City of Raytown
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
Relator-Appellant has appealed from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County denying his petition for a writ of mandamus.
No evidence was introduced, and by agreement the case was decided “on the pleadings” on the basis that they “set forth all the facts necessary for a determination of this case.” Exhibit A to relator’s pleadings is a copy of Ordinance 105 of the City of Raytown, and it is “a part thereof.” Civil Rule 55.14, V.A.M.R. However, we note that in respondents’ brief reference is made to, and an appendix to the brief contains, other ordinances. They…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Veal v. LeimkuehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- MacK v. MacKSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Kansas City v. National Engineering & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Thompson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- State ex rel. Daniels v. KastenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Interest of J________ Y________Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Williams v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Curtis v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State ex rel. Beeler v. City of RaytownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Herndon v. FordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.