Legal Opinion

Fox v. Paul

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1930No. [No. 23, October Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatttsox, J.

The appellant, Kate S. Fox, was, in the year 1915, the owner of five and three-quarter acres of land, lying on the east side of the Keisterstown Koad, in Baltimore County, Maryland. On the south of the land owned by the appellant is what is described as the “Church Lot,” and the lands at that time owned by Hugh Albert Cooper; the church lot being immediately upon the Keisterstown Koad and the Cooper land being in the rear of the church lot. Between the appellant's land and the church property is an open road of the width of twenty-five feet, extending back a distance of three hundred and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oliver v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  2. Holland v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  3. Hintze v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  4. Duvall v. RidoutCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. McKenney v. McKenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Condry v. LaurieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Greenwalt v. McCardellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  3. Hancock v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Zimmerman v. SummersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Shpak v. OletskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API