Legal Opinion
United States v. Perdiz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1966No. 65 Cr. 417PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
On May 9, 1966, the defendant, Antonio L. Perdiz, was convicted of attempted bribery in a trial before me, sitting without a jury. Perdiz has now moved to set aside his conviction and for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the inculpatory statements attributed to him were introduced in evidence in violation of his rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. Specifically, he claims that they are not admissible (1) because they are the “fruit” of an illegal arrest, and (2) because he was not warned of his right to remain silent and his right…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Hyman WinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Louie Gim Hall and Wong Suey LoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Charles C. SolesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- People v. MiddletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Joseph Gentile and Ernest LaponzinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- People v. Roderick WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- United States v. PersicoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.