Legal Opinion
Kaku Nagano v. Brownell, Atty. Gen
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 22, 1954No. 10965PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge,
In Kaku Nagano v. McGrath, 7 Cir., 187 F.2d 759, we determined that the averments of plaintiff’s complaint constituted a statement of a good cause of action and accordingly reversed the judgment of the District Court to the contrary. The Supreme Court affirmed, in McGrath v. Kaku Nagano, 342 U.S. 916, 72 S.Ct. 363, 96 L.Ed. 685, by an evenly divided court. Upon remand for trial, the District Court, upon the stipulated facts and certain additional evidence, found, essentially, that the averments of the complaint had been proved and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Josephberg v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Stadtmuller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sylvia Evans v. City of Chicago, Bertha Balark v. City of Chicago, Curtis Collum, Cross-Appellants v. City of Chicago, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Appleton Electric Company v. Graves Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Rosendo Chavez-Ramirez and Zenaida Calderon De Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Rothner v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- J. Fred Creek v. Village of Westhaven, Illinois Housing Development Authority, Village of Orland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.