Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Plaisted-Harman
Montana Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 2009No. DA 08-0453PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH
¶1 Amber Guffin (Amber) appeals from the August 21, 2008, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Amending Parenting Plan, entered by the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, Prairie County. We reverse.
¶2 Amber presents the following issue for review: Whether the District Court erred in entering a modified parenting plan changing the primary custody of the children from her to Thomas on the ground that she was moving to Kalispell and was therefore required to pay the price of reduced parental contact with the children.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶3 Amber and Thomas…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Marriage of Guffin v. Plaisted-HarmanMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- STEAB v. LunaMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Marriage of Woerner v. WoernerMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- McKay v. Wilderness Development, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.