Dewsnap v. Matthews
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Moses Matthews and another, and by Irving Bachvach and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 29th day of January, 19.07, denying tlie appellants’ motion to resettle a prior order so as to show that the motion which it denied was made on behalf of the defendants Matthews and Yalensteiu, and also oh behalf of Irving Bachracli and Isaac…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendants, Moses Matthews and another, and by Irving Bachvach and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 29th day of January, 19.07, denying tlie appellants’ motion to resettle a prior order so as to show that the motion which it denied was made on behalf of the defendants Matthews and Yalensteiu, and also oh behalf of Irving Bachracli and Isaac Selnneidler.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
This action .was to foreclose a mortgage. Before the defendants appeared the plaintiff obtained an ex parte order appointing a receiver of the mortgaged premises.
On the 24th of December, 1906, an order was obtained requiring the plaintiff to show cause- why the order appointing the receiver should not be vacated and why Bachracli and Selnneidler should not be made parties defendant and a supplemental summons issued, and why the defendants and Bachracli and Schmeidler. should not have such other and further relief as to the court might seem just and proper in the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Kay-Fries, Inc. v. MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Dewsnap v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907