Legal Opinion

O'ROURKE v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1999PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue presented is whether the Department of Corrections, Martin F. Horn, David H. Larkins, Thomas Stachelek, Thomas Martin, John Docknovitch, Mark Rapson, and Samuel Zambeto (collectively, Respondents) are entitled to summary judgment against William H. O’Rourke (Petitioner). We conclude that they are entitled to partial summary judgment.

The relevant facts are as follows. On January 21, 1997, Petitioner filed a complaint in our original jurisdiction alleging that Respondents violated the Whistle-blower Law. 1 On April 1, 1996, Petitioner, who is employed at the State…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Rodgers v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Kee v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Perry v. Tioga CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. O'ROURKE v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. D. Moon v. Dauphin CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Albright v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Campion v. Northeast UtilitiesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. CICCHIELLO v. BeardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API