Legal Opinion
H. E. & S. Transportation Corp. v. Checker Cab Sales Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCeouch, J.
The action was brought under section 80-e of the Personal Property Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 41) to recover one-fourth of the amount paid to the defendant on account of the purchase price of certain taxicabs. The taxicabs were retaken by the seller on May 17, 1933. Notice of sale was given to the buyer on May 18th. The sale was had on May 29th, the day stated in the notice. May 28th was a Sunday. The complaint alleged shortage (1) in the ten-day redemption period granted to the buyer by Personal Property Law, section 78; and (2) in the ten days’ written notice of sale period required by Personal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. . BurgessNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Kane v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Strickland v. Hare & Chase, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Jones v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fisk Discount Corp. v. Brooklyn Taxicab Trans. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- First Bank & Trust Co. v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Santow v. UllmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- People v. DiMeglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Santow v. UllmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.