Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Hare & Chase, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant is trustee in bankruptcy of Avery D. Case. In July, 1924, Case bought an automobile from respondent’s assignor for $1,226, under a conditional sale contract. The vendee made default in payment after making total payments of $726.50. Respondent retook the automobile without serving a preliminary notice of intention to do so.

Sections 76 to 80-j of the Personal Property Law (as added by Laws of 1922, chap. 642), known as the Uniform Conditional Sales Act, regulate the procedure in such transactions. Under section 78 the seller “ shall retain the goods for ten days after retaking.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Freeman v. EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  2. Sherman v. SlaybackNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Manhattan Taxi Service Corp. v. Checker Cab Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. H. E. & S. Transportation Corp. v. Checker Cab Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Manhattan Taxi Service Corp. v. Checker Cab Manufacturing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Carter v. Brockway Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Eisenberg v. Commercial Credit Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API