Jones v. Hollingsworth
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The single issue raised in this appeal presents a “hornbook” question of elementary contract law. What is the legal effect of a “condition” which is an event within the control of a party who seeks to avoid the contract?
The parties to the contract are the heirs of Claude Hol-lingsworth, deceased. Proponent, Howard Hollingsworth, is the named executor of Claude Hollingsworth’s purported last will. Contestants, J. Y. Hollingsworth, Max Hollings-worth, Fred Hollingsworth, and Elaine Bollam are Howard’s siblings who have contested both the will and an inter vivos transaction between Howard and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Whiteside v. North American Accident InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- O'Reilly v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Gould v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Hale v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. WN144245 v. The Vision AFH LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021