Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hollingsworth

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 8, 1975No. 3377-43021-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

The single issue raised in this appeal presents a “hornbook” question of elementary contract law. What is the legal effect of a “condition” which is an event within the control of a party who seeks to avoid the contract?

The parties to the contract are the heirs of Claude Hol-lingsworth, deceased. Proponent, Howard Hollingsworth, is the named executor of Claude Hollingsworth’s purported last will. Contestants, J. Y. Hollingsworth, Max Hollings-worth, Fred Hollingsworth, and Elaine Bollam are Howard’s siblings who have contested both the will and an inter vivos transaction between Howard and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Whiteside v. North American Accident InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. O'Reilly v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Gould v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hale v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. WN144245 v. The Vision AFH LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API