Legal Opinion
Boucher v. Dramstad
District Court, D. Montana
Decided September 17, 1981No. CV-80-66-GFPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HATFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Ronald S. Boucher, commenced the present action seeking relief for damages claimed to have been suffered as a result of defendants’ alleged violation of plaintiff’s constitutional rights under the United States Constitution.
Defendants have countered by filing a motion for summary judgment, contending that the plaintiff is barred under the doctrine of res judicata from asserting the federal constitutional claim. Defendants maintain that a prior decision in the courts of the State of Montana, which found that a stipulation of dismissal with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chestnut Hill Development Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Harlem Irrigation District v. Montana Seventeenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Peterson v. Montana Bank of Bozeman, NAMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Whirry v. SwansonMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Delve v. Three Lakes Water & Sanitation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.