Legal Opinion
Behradrezaee v. Dashtara
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 2006No. 03-CV-1297PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Senior Judge:
Appellant, Nader Behradrezaee, appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing his derivative action against appellees, NAMA Discounter, Inc. (NAMA), a corporation, and M. John Dashtara (Dashtara), an officer and director of NAMA, for failure to state a claim. He argues that the trial court erred in its ruling because: (1) the complaint meets the particularized pleading requirements of Super. Ct. Civ. R. 23.1 (governing a corporate shareholders derivative action); and (2) the court could not determine on a motion to dismiss under Super. Ct. Civ. R. 12(b)(6) that the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Estate of Raleigh v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Potomac Development Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Millennium Square Residential Association v. 2200 M Street LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Harpole Architects, P.C. v. BarlowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.