Legal Opinion

Runbeck v. Farmers & Bankers Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1915No. 19,598PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from McPherson district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*187The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

This appeal presents the question whether or not the defendant company is liable to the plaintiff by virtue of its contract with The Security Life Association and the certificate issued by the latter to the plaintiff’s husband, Olaf B. Runbeck. It is claimed by the plaintiff that the issuing company was liable on the certificate notwithstanding the fact that the monthly premium was unpaid at the time of her husband’s death, because of a custom long practiced of receiving past-due payments, and that the defendant company is liable by reason of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edmiston v. HomesteadersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Fenn v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rosario v. Atlantic Southern Ins.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
  2. O'HARE v. PursellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Roberts v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Roberts v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Rosario v. Atlantic Southern Ins.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API