Legal Opinion

John Barkley & Co. v. Ham & Seymour

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 5, 1921No. 24534PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.'

MONROE, C. .J.

Plaintiff alleges that it entered into two contracts, in each of which defendants agreed to purchase for its account 500 tons of Java sugar of a certain grade, and for the purchase of each of which it caused the Whitney Central National Bank to issue a letter of credit to defendants, authorizing them to draw upon it for the price of said sugar, and that, although defendants failed to comply with said contracts, they drew certain drafts against said letters, and although the drafts were “refused payment, petitioner fears that payment will be made upon…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Van Reed v. People's National Bank of LebanonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Earle v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Citizens' Bank of Columbia v. Bellamy Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Baker v. FrellsenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Succession of PavelkaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Drewes & Co. v. Ham & SeymourSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  3. Typhoon Fan Co. v. PilsburySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. Gottlieb v. Avery Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  5. Woods v. William Rednour Transfer Storage Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API