Legal Opinion

Scott v. Rainier Power & Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1895No. 1842PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.— Hon. T. J. Humes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

The Rainier Power and Railway Company, a domestic corporation, on the 21st day of December, 1892, entered into a written agreement with Francis E. Scott, (who subsequently entered into partnership with T. J. Hartley, who acquired an interest in said agreement) whereby it was agreed that said Scott Was to cut from a certain tract of land and deliver to the Rainier Power and Railway Com*109pany saw logs of suitable length, as said corporation from time to time should order, at a certain stipulated price. These logs were to be used in a mill,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Express Co. v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Pringle v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. People ex rel. Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Supervisor & Town ClerkIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wells v. Hartford Manilla Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Crawford v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Coy v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1912
  4. Cogan v. Conover Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  5. Casey v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API