Legal Opinion

State v. Wetrich

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 14, 2013No. 106,002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

In this criminal appeal, Roy Wetrich contends the district court erred when it prevented him from presenting evidence that his wife had lied about him in a statement she gave the police. Kansas law allows a witness’ credibility to be attacked by presenting *35evidence that the witness has a character trait for dishonesty. That trait may not be proved by evidence of a specific instance of conduct but may be proved only by opinion testimony. Because Wet-rich sought the admission of evidence he claimed would prove his wife had lied to the police, a specific instance, we hold the district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. DaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WetrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API