State v. Wetrich
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
In this criminal appeal, Roy Wetrich contends the district court erred when it prevented him from presenting evidence that his wife had lied about him in a statement she gave the police. Kansas law allows a witness’ credibility to be attacked by presenting *35evidence that the witness has a character trait for dishonesty. That trait may not be proved by evidence of a specific instance of conduct but may be proved only by opinion testimony. Because Wet-rich sought the admission of evidence he claimed would prove his wife had lied to the police, a specific instance, we hold the district…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. DaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WetrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020