Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Hankins

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 21, 2014No. 109,123Published

1ConcurrenceAtcheson, J.

I. Introduction

I reluctantly concur in the majority’s conclusion that, on the merits, the Johnson County District Court correcdy relied on the felony prosecution of Defendant Anthony Hankins in Oklahoma to establish his criminal history score in this case, even though he was never adjudged guilty in Oklahoma and the prosecution was ulti*986mately dismissed. I do so based on the reasoning of a panel of this court in State v. Macias, 30 Kan. App. 2d 79, 83, 39 P.3d 85, rev. denied 273 Kan. 1038 (2002), and endorsed a few months later by the Kansas Supreme Court in State v. Pollard, 273 Kan. 706,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API