Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Fagin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 14, 1992No. SCBD 3755. OBAD 1021Published
1Opinion of the Court
848 P.2d 11 (1992)
STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel., OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,
v.
Arnold D. FAGIN, Respondent.
SCBD 3755. OBAD 1021.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
July 14, 1992.
Rehearing Denied October 5, 1992.
Dan Murdock, Gen. Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Ass'n, Oklahoma City, for complainant.
James A. Kirk, Thomas J. Daniel, Kirk & Chaney, Oklahoma City, for respondent.
SIMMS, Justice:
Respondent, Arnold D. Fagin, was the subject of a formal complaint filed by the Oklahoma Bar Association, which alleged that he violated Rule 1.5 of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct, 5 O.S.Supp. 1988, Ch. 1,…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Kauger; Concurrence · Kauger.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Lien v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Swanson v. SwansonOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- Connors v. ConnorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.