Johnson v. JC Penney, Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KENDALL, District Judge. ,.
Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed June 13, 1994. After consideration of the motion, the response, the reply and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
This action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. and under § 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, (“§ 1981”), 42 U.S.C., § 1981, stems from the decision of J.C. Penney to terminate the employment of the Plaintiff Milton Johnson (“Johnson”).…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Bodenheimer v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hollins v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Agugliaro v. Brooks Bros., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Beene v. St. Vincent Mercy Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000